On 9/17/2015 03:42, Mark Brown wrote:
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 11:11:53AM +0800, Wu, Songjun wrote:
I try to use one entry, but there is a problem.
It's about 'driver_data' in struct device.
In function snd_soc_register_card, the parameter 'card' will be set to
'driver_data' by the code 'dev_s
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 11:11:53AM +0800, Wu, Songjun wrote:
> I try to use one entry, but there is a problem.
> It's about 'driver_data' in struct device.
> In function snd_soc_register_card, the parameter 'card' will be set to
> 'driver_data' by the code 'dev_set_drvdata(card->dev, card)'.
> The
On 9/8/2015 20:23, Mark Brown wrote:
On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 05:36:13PM +0800, Wu, Songjun wrote:
On 9/8/2015 00:25, Mark Brown wrote:
Sure, there's no problem at all having that structure in software but it
should be possible to do this without having to represent this structure
in DT. It
On 9/8/2015 20:23, Mark Brown wrote:
On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 05:36:13PM +0800, Wu, Songjun wrote:
On 9/8/2015 00:25, Mark Brown wrote:
Sure, there's no problem at all having that structure in software but it
should be possible to do this without having to represent this structure
in DT. It
On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 05:36:13PM +0800, Wu, Songjun wrote:
> On 9/8/2015 00:25, Mark Brown wrote:
> >Sure, there's no problem at all having that structure in software but it
> >should be possible to do this without having to represent this structure
> >in DT. It should be possible to register t
On 9/8/2015 00:25, Mark Brown wrote:
On Sun, Sep 06, 2015 at 05:44:30PM +0800, Wu, Songjun wrote:
On 9/3/2015 19:43, Mark Brown wrote:
Why is this a separate DT node? It seems that this IP is entirely self
contained so I'm not clear why we need a separate node for the card, the
card is usu
On Sun, Sep 06, 2015 at 05:44:30PM +0800, Wu, Songjun wrote:
> On 9/3/2015 19:43, Mark Brown wrote:
> >Why is this a separate DT node? It seems that this IP is entirely self
> >contained so I'm not clear why we need a separate node for the card, the
> >card is usually a separate node because it t
On 9/3/2015 19:43, Mark Brown wrote:
On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 01:41:41PM +0800, Songjun Wu wrote:
+classd: classd@fc048000 {
+ compatible = "atmel,sama5d2-classd";
+ reg = <0xfc048000 0x100>;
+ interrupts = <59 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 7>;
+ d
On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 01:41:41PM +0800, Songjun Wu wrote:
> +classd: classd@fc048000 {
> + compatible = "atmel,sama5d2-classd";
> + reg = <0xfc048000 0x100>;
> + interrupts = <59 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 7>;
> + dmas = <&dma0
> + (AT
9 matches
Mail list logo
