Lightly updated the patch to shrink patch2 by naming a variable the
same in patch 1, to avoid a rename of a local variable in patch2. And
fixed one trivial checkpatch warning, and a trivial rebase issue.
Tentatively merged into cifs-2.6.git for-next pending more review(s)
and also the usual regre
No objections on my part as far as adding 'if (info & SACL_SECINFO) return'.
I had originally those flags sent from the caller, but that was
confusing at the top level (e.g. in cifsacl.c), so I have opted to
passing only "extra" flags ("additional" was already taken).
-
...
> > --- a/
Minor comments inline...
On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 2:30 AM Boris Protopopov wrote:
>
> Fix passing of the additional security info via version
> operations. Force new open when getting SACL and avoid
> reuse of files that were previously open without
> sufficient privileges to access SACLs.
>
> Sig
3 matches
Mail list logo
