Alan Cox napsal(a):
> I think just using tty_wakeup for this ought to be sufficient unless they
> are using the work queue for some kind of serialization of events
Actually this is what I wanted to hear. Going to change those which does it.
thanks,
--js
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the l
On Thu, 1 Nov 2007 11:55:56 +0100 (CET)
Jiri Slaby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> tty, add tty_schedule_wakeup
>
> Because several drivers schedule a workqueue only for tty_wakeup, move this
> functionality into tty layer and use newly added centralized work.
I've no idea why any drivers do this.
Jiri Slaby wrote:
+ * Functionally the same as tty_wakeup, but it can be used in hot
+ * paths. since the wakeup is scheduled and done in the future.
I'm not familiar with the terminology 'hot paths',
what do you mean by that?
Do you have an example of where you intend to
use this new
Paul Fulghum napsal(a):
> Jiri Slaby wrote:
>> + *Functionally the same as tty_wakeup, but it can be used in hot
>> + *paths. since the wakeup is scheduled and done in the future.
>>
>
> I'm not familiar with the terminology 'hot paths',
> what do you mean by that?
Ah, thank you for the f
4 matches
Mail list logo