Re: [PATCH 2/2] UML - Fix kernel stack size on x86_64

2007-06-06 Thread Andrew Morton
On Wed, 6 Jun 2007 11:11:34 -0400 Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 06:20:24PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > If you do > > > > - int "Kernel stack size order" > > + int > > > > then this rule will no longer be offered to the user and `make oldconfig' > > (actua

Re: [PATCH 2/2] UML - Fix kernel stack size on x86_64

2007-06-06 Thread Jeff Dike
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 06:20:24PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > If you do > > - int "Kernel stack size order" > + int > > then this rule will no longer be offered to the user and `make oldconfig' > (actually anythingconfig) will override whatever happens to be in .config > for KERNEL_STA

Re: [PATCH 2/2] UML - Fix kernel stack size on x86_64

2007-06-05 Thread Andrew Morton
On Tue, 5 Jun 2007 20:37:52 -0400 Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 05:00:01PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Tue, 5 Jun 2007 16:50:55 -0400 > > Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > [ This is 2.6.22 material ] > > > > > > Having KERNEL_STACK_ORDER in de

Re: [PATCH 2/2] UML - Fix kernel stack size on x86_64

2007-06-05 Thread Jeff Dike
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 05:00:01PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Tue, 5 Jun 2007 16:50:55 -0400 > Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > [ This is 2.6.22 material ] > > > > Having KERNEL_STACK_ORDER in defconfig overrides the value provided by > > Kconfig, breaking UML/x86_64, which wants

Re: [PATCH 2/2] UML - Fix kernel stack size on x86_64

2007-06-05 Thread Andrew Morton
On Tue, 5 Jun 2007 16:50:55 -0400 Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [ This is 2.6.22 material ] > > Having KERNEL_STACK_ORDER in defconfig overrides the value provided by > Kconfig, breaking UML/x86_64, which wants 2 page stacks. > > Signed-off-by: Jeff Dike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > -- > arch