On Sun, 2016-01-31 at 03:52 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Sat, 2016-01-30 at 21:36 +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 06:53:05PM +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2016-01-30 at 15:20 +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 05:43:28PM
On Sat, 2016-01-30 at 21:36 +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 06:53:05PM +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > On Sat, 2016-01-30 at 15:20 +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 05:43:28PM -0500, Rik van Riel wrote:
> >
> > > > Run times for the microb
On Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 06:53:05PM +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Sat, 2016-01-30 at 15:20 +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 05:43:28PM -0500, Rik van Riel wrote:
>
> > > Run times for the microbenchmark:
> > >
> > > 4.4 3.8 seconds
> > >
On Sat, 2016-01-30 at 15:20 +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 05:43:28PM -0500, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > Run times for the microbenchmark:
> >
> > 4.4 3.8 seconds
> > 4.5-rc1 3.7 seconds
> > 4.5-rc1 + first patch
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 05:43:28PM -0500, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On 01/29/2016 05:23 PM, r...@redhat.com wrote:
> > From: Rik van Riel
>
> > This speeds up
>
> ... ok, that changelog got truncated :(
>
> Here is the full version:
>
>
> Because __acct_update_integrals does nothing unless the ti
On 01/29/2016 05:23 PM, r...@redhat.com wrote:
> From: Rik van Riel
> This speeds up
... ok, that changelog got truncated :(
Here is the full version:
Because __acct_update_integrals does nothing unless the time
interval in question exceeds a jiffy, there is no real reason
to call it more tha
6 matches
Mail list logo