Re: [PATCH 2/2] sh, rwsem: drop superfluous arch specific implementation

2016-04-06 Thread Peter Zijlstra
On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 11:50:00AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Dag Peter, > > On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 11:26 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > +Cc maintainers, linux-sh list is very high signal-to-noise as its been > > appropriated for renesas arm parts. > > FTR, Renesas ARM parts have moved to

Re: [PATCH 2/2] sh, rwsem: drop superfluous arch specific implementation

2016-04-06 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
Dag Peter, On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 11:26 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > +Cc maintainers, linux-sh list is very high signal-to-noise as its been > appropriated for renesas arm parts. FTR, Renesas ARM parts have moved to linux-renesas-soc. Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert U

Re: [PATCH 2/2] sh, rwsem: drop superfluous arch specific implementation

2016-04-06 Thread Peter Zijlstra
+Cc maintainers, linux-sh list is very high signal-to-noise as its been appropriated for renesas arm parts. On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 11:06:40AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: > From: Michal Hocko > > since "locking, rwsem: drop explicit memory barriers" the arch specific > code is basically same as