On Tue, 2008-01-15 at 20:18 +0300, Anton Salikhmetov wrote:
> 2008/1/15, Peter Zijlstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > On Tue, 2008-01-15 at 19:02 +0300, Anton Salikhmetov wrote:
> >
> > > diff --git a/mm/page-writeback.c b/mm/page-writeback.c
> > > index 3d3848f..53d0e34 100644
> > > --- a/mm/page-
2008/1/15, Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 07:02:45PM +0300, Anton Salikhmetov wrote:
> > +/*
> > + * Update the ctime and mtime stamps for memory-mapped block device files.
> > + */
> > +static void bd_inode_update_time(struct inode *inode, struct timespec *ts)
> >
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 07:02:45PM +0300, Anton Salikhmetov wrote:
> +/*
> + * Update the ctime and mtime stamps for memory-mapped block device files.
> + */
> +static void bd_inode_update_time(struct inode *inode, struct timespec *ts)
> +{
> + struct block_device *bdev = inode->i_bdev;
> +
2008/1/15, Peter Zijlstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On Tue, 2008-01-15 at 19:02 +0300, Anton Salikhmetov wrote:
>
> > diff --git a/mm/page-writeback.c b/mm/page-writeback.c
> > index 3d3848f..53d0e34 100644
> > --- a/mm/page-writeback.c
> > +++ b/mm/page-writeback.c
> > @@ -997,35 +997,39 @@ int __s
On Tue, 2008-01-15 at 19:02 +0300, Anton Salikhmetov wrote:
> diff --git a/mm/page-writeback.c b/mm/page-writeback.c
> index 3d3848f..53d0e34 100644
> --- a/mm/page-writeback.c
> +++ b/mm/page-writeback.c
> @@ -997,35 +997,39 @@ int __set_page_dirty_no_writeback(struct page *page)
> */
> int _
2008/1/15, Miklos Szeredi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Thanks for your review, Peter and Miklos!
> >
> > I overlooked this case when AS_MCTIME flag has been turned off and the
> > page is still dirty.
> >
> > On the other hand, the words "shall be marked for update" may be
> > considered as just settin
> Thanks for your review, Peter and Miklos!
>
> I overlooked this case when AS_MCTIME flag has been turned off and the
> page is still dirty.
>
> On the other hand, the words "shall be marked for update" may be
> considered as just setting the AS_MCTIME flag, not updating the time
> stamps.
>
>
2008/1/14, Miklos Szeredi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > 2008/1/14, Miklos Szeredi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2645
> > > >
> > > > Changes for updating the ctime and mtime fields for memory-mapped files:
> > > >
> > > > 1) new flag triggering update of the ino
2008/1/14, Peter Zijlstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On Mon, 2008-01-14 at 14:14 +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> > > 2008/1/14, Miklos Szeredi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > > > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2645
> > > > >
> > > > > Changes for updating the ctime and mtime fields for memory-m
> > More fun, it would require marking them RO but leaving the dirty bit
> > set, because this ext3 fudge where we confuse the page dirty state - or
> > did that get fixed?
>
> That got fixed by Nick, I think.
>
> The alternative to marking pages RO, is to walk the PTEs in MS_ASYNC,
> note the di
> More fun, it would require marking them RO but leaving the dirty bit
> set, because this ext3 fudge where we confuse the page dirty state - or
> did that get fixed?
That got fixed by Nick, I think.
The alternative to marking pages RO, is to walk the PTEs in MS_ASYNC,
note the dirty bit and mark
On Mon, 2008-01-14 at 14:35 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-01-14 at 14:14 +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> > > 2008/1/14, Miklos Szeredi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > > > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2645
> > > > >
> > > > > Changes for updating the ctime and mtime fields for
On Mon, 2008-01-14 at 14:14 +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> > 2008/1/14, Miklos Szeredi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2645
> > > >
> > > > Changes for updating the ctime and mtime fields for memory-mapped files:
> > > >
> > > > 1) new flag triggering update
> 2008/1/14, Miklos Szeredi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2645
> > >
> > > Changes for updating the ctime and mtime fields for memory-mapped files:
> > >
> > > 1) new flag triggering update of the inode data;
> > > 2) new function to update ctime and mtime fo
2008/1/14, Miklos Szeredi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2645
> > >
> > > Changes for updating the ctime and mtime fields for memory-mapped files:
> > >
> > > 1) new flag triggering update of the inode data;
> > > 2) new function to update ctime and mtime for
2008/1/14, Miklos Szeredi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2645
> >
> > Changes for updating the ctime and mtime fields for memory-mapped files:
> >
> > 1) new flag triggering update of the inode data;
> > 2) new function to update ctime and mtime for block device
> > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2645
> >
> > Changes for updating the ctime and mtime fields for memory-mapped files:
> >
> > 1) new flag triggering update of the inode data;
> > 2) new function to update ctime and mtime for block device files;
> > 3) new helper function to update
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2645
>
> Changes for updating the ctime and mtime fields for memory-mapped files:
>
> 1) new flag triggering update of the inode data;
> 2) new function to update ctime and mtime for block device files;
> 3) new helper function to update ctime and mtim
On Sun, 13 Jan 2008 07:39:59 +0300
Anton Salikhmetov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2645
>
> Changes for updating the ctime and mtime fields for memory-mapped files:
>
> 1) new flag triggering update of the inode data;
> 2) new function to update ctime an
19 matches
Mail list logo
