Re: [PATCH 2/3] dt-bindings: clock: ti: remove unstable remark

2024-02-28 Thread Tony Lindgren
* Stephen Boyd [240228 22:59]: > +Tony > > Quoting Krzysztof Kozlowski (2024-02-24 01:12:35) > > Several TI SoC clock bindings were marked as work-in-progress / unstable > > between 2013-2016, for example in commit f60b1ea5ea7a ("CLK: TI: add > > support for gate clock"). It was enough of time t

Re: [PATCH 2/3] dt-bindings: clock: ti: remove unstable remark

2024-02-28 Thread Stephen Boyd
+Tony Quoting Krzysztof Kozlowski (2024-02-24 01:12:35) > Several TI SoC clock bindings were marked as work-in-progress / unstable > between 2013-2016, for example in commit f60b1ea5ea7a ("CLK: TI: add > support for gate clock"). It was enough of time to consider them stable > and expect usual AB

Re: [PATCH 2/3] dt-bindings: clock: ti: remove unstable remark

2024-02-26 Thread Rob Herring
On Sat, 24 Feb 2024 10:12:35 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > Several TI SoC clock bindings were marked as work-in-progress / unstable > between 2013-2016, for example in commit f60b1ea5ea7a ("CLK: TI: add > support for gate clock"). It was enough of time to consider them stable > and expect