On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 8:17 PM David Gow wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 3:41 AM Daniel Latypov wrote:
> >
>
> This seems good to me, but I have a few questions, particularly around
> the description.
>
> > The code to handle aggregating statuses didn't check that the status
> > actually got se
On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 3:41 AM Daniel Latypov wrote:
>
This seems good to me, but I have a few questions, particularly around
the description.
> The code to handle aggregating statuses didn't check that the status
> actually got set.
I don't understand what you mean here. Does this refer to
Tes
2 matches
Mail list logo
