Re: [PATCH 2/4] Documentation: devicetree: arm: Document Marvell IAP140

2017-02-20 Thread Thomas Petazzoni
Hello, On Mon, 20 Feb 2017 14:16:13 +0100, Andreas Färber wrote: > I'm confused now. According to Marvell IR [0] they are NASDAQ-listed as > MRVL. My understanding is that in that case the official vendor prefix > becomes mrvl. Why not here? Not sure why, but as of today, we have a mix of "mrvl"

Re: [PATCH 2/4] Documentation: devicetree: arm: Document Marvell IAP140

2017-02-20 Thread Andreas Färber
Hi, Am 20.02.2017 um 13:56 schrieb Thomas Petazzoni: > On Sun, 19 Feb 2017 04:19:58 +0100, Andreas Färber wrote: > >> + - compatible : must contain "mrvl,iap140" > > Even though there's indeed a good number of existing "mrvl," compatible > strings in the tree, the official vendor prefix accordi

Re: [PATCH 2/4] Documentation: devicetree: arm: Document Marvell IAP140

2017-02-20 Thread Thomas Petazzoni
Hello, On Sun, 19 Feb 2017 04:19:58 +0100, Andreas Färber wrote: > + - compatible : must contain "mrvl,iap140" Even though there's indeed a good number of existing "mrvl," compatible strings in the tree, the official vendor prefix according to Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.t