Hi!
> > > Got a new suspend patchsset at
> > >
> > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org:/pub/linux/kernel/people/christoph/suspend/2.6.13-rc4-mm1
> > >
> > > Check the series file for the sequence of patches.
> >
> > Something still goes very wrong after first resume. It seems to work
> > ok for few seconds
On Mon, 8 Aug 2005, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > Got a new suspend patchsset at
> >
> > ftp://ftp.kernel.org:/pub/linux/kernel/people/christoph/suspend/2.6.13-rc4-mm1
> >
> > Check the series file for the sequence of patches.
>
> Something still goes very wrong after first resume. It seems
Hi!
> Got a new suspend patchsset at
>
> ftp://ftp.kernel.org:/pub/linux/kernel/people/christoph/suspend/2.6.13-rc4-mm1
>
> Check the series file for the sequence of patches.
Something still goes very wrong after first resume. It seems to work
ok for few seconds, then console switch takes 10 s
Got a new suspend patchsset at
ftp://ftp.kernel.org:/pub/linux/kernel/people/christoph/suspend/2.6.13-rc4-mm1
Check the series file for the sequence of patches.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordom
Hi!
> > > Yes I told you to remove the TIF_FREEZE patch.
> >
> > Okay, I took 2.6.13-rc3-mm3, removed TIF_FREEZE patch, and applied
> > your series. (This time it applied cleanly). After first suspend
> > machine locked hard at time it should switch back to original
> > console. On the next try,
On Sat, 30 Jul 2005, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Yes I told you to remove the TIF_FREEZE patch.
>
> Okay, I took 2.6.13-rc3-mm3, removed TIF_FREEZE patch, and applied
> your series. (This time it applied cleanly). After first suspend
> machine locked hard at time it should switch back to original
> c
Hi!
> > /*
> > * Check if there is a request to freeze a process
> > */
> > static inline int freezing(struct task_struct *p)
> > {
> > return test_ti_thread_flag(p->thread_info, TIF_FREEZE);
> > }
>
> Yes I told you to remove the TIF_FREEZE patch.
Okay, I took 2.6.13-rc3-mm3, removed
On Sat, 30 Jul 2005, Pavel Machek wrote:
> No wonder when -mm already contains:
>
> /*
> * Check if there is a request to freeze a process
> */
> static inline int freezing(struct task_struct *p)
> {
> return test_ti_thread_flag(p->thread_info, TIF_FREEZE);
> }
Yes I told you to remove
Hi!
> > Introduce a todo notifier in the task_struct so that a task can be told to
> > do
> > certain things. Abuse the suspend hooks try_to_freeze, freezing and
> > refrigerator
> > to establish checkpoints where the todo list is processed. This will break
> > software
> > suspend (next patch
Hi!
> Introduce a todo notifier in the task_struct so that a task can be told to do
> certain things. Abuse the suspend hooks try_to_freeze, freezing and
> refrigerator
> to establish checkpoints where the todo list is processed. This will break
> software
> suspend (next patch fixes and cleans
10 matches
Mail list logo
