Re: [PATCH 2/5] dma_map_sg_ring() helper

2007-12-20 Thread Rusty Russell
On Friday 21 December 2007 11:40:00 David Miller wrote: > From: Rusty Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2007 11:35:12 +1100 > > > On Friday 21 December 2007 11:00:27 FUJITA Tomonori wrote: > > > We need to pass the whole sg entries to the IOMMUs at a time. > > > > Hi Fujita, > > > >

Re: [PATCH 2/5] dma_map_sg_ring() helper

2007-12-20 Thread FUJITA Tomonori
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 16:40:00 -0800 (PST) David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: Rusty Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2007 11:35:12 +1100 > > > On Friday 21 December 2007 11:00:27 FUJITA Tomonori wrote: > > > We need to pass the whole sg entries to the IOMMUs at a time. >

Re: [PATCH 2/5] dma_map_sg_ring() helper

2007-12-20 Thread David Miller
From: Rusty Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2007 11:35:12 +1100 > On Friday 21 December 2007 11:00:27 FUJITA Tomonori wrote: > > We need to pass the whole sg entries to the IOMMUs at a time. > > Hi Fujita, > > OK, it's certainly possible to have an arch override. For which >

Re: [PATCH 2/5] dma_map_sg_ring() helper

2007-12-20 Thread Rusty Russell
On Friday 21 December 2007 11:00:27 FUJITA Tomonori wrote: > We need to pass the whole sg entries to the IOMMUs at a time. Hi Fujita, OK, it's certainly possible to have an arch override. For which architecture is this BTW? Thanks, Rusty. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "

Re: [PATCH 2/5] dma_map_sg_ring() helper

2007-12-20 Thread FUJITA Tomonori
On Fri, 21 Dec 2007 09:58:56 +1100 Rusty Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thursday 20 December 2007 18:42:44 David Miller wrote: > > From: FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 16:06:31 +0900 > > > > > On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 16:49:30 +1100 > > > > > > Rusty Russell <[E

Re: [PATCH 2/5] dma_map_sg_ring() helper

2007-12-20 Thread Rusty Russell
On Thursday 20 December 2007 18:42:44 David Miller wrote: > From: FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 16:06:31 +0900 > > > On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 16:49:30 +1100 > > > > Rusty Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > +/** > > > + * dma_map_sg_ring - Map an entire sg ring > > >

Re: [PATCH 2/5] dma_map_sg_ring() helper

2007-12-19 Thread David Miller
From: FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 16:06:31 +0900 > On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 16:49:30 +1100 > Rusty Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > +/** > > + * dma_map_sg_ring - Map an entire sg ring > > + * @dev: Device to free noncoherent memory for > > + * @sg: The sg_ring >

Re: [PATCH 2/5] dma_map_sg_ring() helper

2007-12-19 Thread FUJITA Tomonori
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 16:49:30 +1100 Rusty Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Obvious counterpart to dma_map_sg. Note that this is arch-independent > code; sg_rings are backwards compatible with simple sg arrays. > > Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > --- > drivers/base/dma-mapp