> From: eric miao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 16:40:04 +0800
> Subject: [PATCH] gpiolib: mark drivers/i2c/chips/pca9539.c as deprecated
>
> use drivers/gpio/pca9539.c instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: eric miao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Acked-by: Ben Gardner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Acked-by
On Dec 19, 2007 5:01 PM, Jean Delvare <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
>
> On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 16:45:00 +0800, eric miao wrote:
> > Updated as follows, the driver name is left unchanged, while
> > Kconfig and Documentation are modified so that
> > 1. mark it as deprecated
> > 2. exclusive se
Hi Eric,
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 16:45:00 +0800, eric miao wrote:
> Updated as follows, the driver name is left unchanged, while
> Kconfig and Documentation are modified so that
> 1. mark it as deprecated
> 2. exclusive selection of SENSOR_PCA9539 and GPIO_PCA9539
>
> From c58dc1119355dc94d80763aef9d
Updated as follows, the driver name is left unchanged, while
Kconfig and Documentation are modified so that
1. mark it as deprecated
2. exclusive selection of SENSOR_PCA9539 and GPIO_PCA9539
>From c58dc1119355dc94d80763aef9d9bc999abda6df Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: eric miao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi Eric,
On Tue, 18 Dec 2007 09:54:42 +0800, eric miao wrote:
> Well, I guess it would be a smooth path if we rename the
> drivers/i2c/chips/pca9539.c
> since that's old style I2C driver, which means the driver name is not
> so useful external
> so the impact is actually minimum.
That's fine with
Well, I guess it would be a smooth path if we rename the
drivers/i2c/chips/pca9539.c
since that's old style I2C driver, which means the driver name is not
so useful external
so the impact is actually minimum.
On Dec 18, 2007 4:29 AM, Jean Delvare <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi David,
>
>
> On Mo
Hi David,
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 10:09:53 -0800, David Brownell wrote:
> > Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 14:33:27 +0800
> > From: "eric miao" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > for the following reasons:
> >
> > 1. there is currently no known users of this driver
> >
> > 2. the functionality of this driver is well
> Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 14:33:27 +0800
> From: "eric miao" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> for the following reasons:
>
> 1. there is currently no known users of this driver
>
> 2. the functionality of this driver is well supported with the recent
>proposed drivers/gpio/pca9539.c, using GPIO_LIB
>
> S
[ Updated according to Jean's suggestion, thanks ]
>From 5b4d907da17d57ec168643ebd847278e8d7267f9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: eric miao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2007 12:07:26 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] gpiolib: obsolete drivers/i2c/chips/pca9539.c and related files
for the following r
Eric,
On Sat, 15 Dec 2007 12:16:50 +0800, eric miao wrote:
> From 0bca662f68e7ffe84f333d7d26df25d846713db2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: eric miao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2007 12:07:26 +0800
> Subject: [PATCH] gpiolib: obsolete drivers/i2c/chips/pca9539.c
>
> for the following
10 matches
Mail list logo
