On Sunday 25 November 2007 23:51, Roland McGrath wrote:
> > Why is it defined in configuration system instead of some *.h file?
>
> That seems to be existing practice for this sort of thing.
> I just followed what I saw.
I think that if such conditional constants can be defined
in header files (IO
> What about the non-Intel vendors ?
> Was this msr present on AMD K6 ? Geode? Winchip? VIA C3 ?
> If not, then this patch isn't complete.
I know modern AMD processors have it. I don't know about any others, nor
off hand where to look to find out. Is there a better way to compose the
"depends o
> Why is it defined in configuration system instead of some *.h file?
That seems to be existing practice for this sort of thing.
I just followed what I saw.
Thanks,
Roland
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More
On Sun, Nov 25, 2007 at 02:08:02PM -0800, Roland McGrath wrote:
>
> This adds the (internal) Kconfig macro CONFIG_X86_DEBUGCTLMSR,
> to be defined when configuring to support only hardware that
> definitely supports MSR_IA32_DEBUGCTLMSR with the BTF flag.
>
> The Intel documentation says "P
On Sunday 25 November 2007 14:08, Roland McGrath wrote:
> This adds the (internal) Kconfig macro CONFIG_X86_DEBUGCTLMSR,
> to be defined when configuring to support only hardware that
> definitely supports MSR_IA32_DEBUGCTLMSR with the BTF flag.
>
> The Intel documentation says "P6 family" and late
5 matches
Mail list logo
