On 11/16/2017 11:19 AM, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 11:31:50AM -0800, Dave Hansen wrote:
>> Hugh Dickins also points out that PCIDs really have two distinct
>> use-cases in the context of KAISER. The first way they can be used
> I don't see why you try to retain such a minor
On 11/16/2017 11:19 AM, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 11:31:50AM -0800, Dave Hansen wrote:
>> Hugh Dickins also points out that PCIDs really have two distinct
>> use-cases in the context of KAISER. The first way they can be used
> I don't see why you try to retain such a minor
Hello,
On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 11:31:50AM -0800, Dave Hansen wrote:
> Hugh Dickins also points out that PCIDs really have two distinct
> use-cases in the context of KAISER. The first way they can be used
I don't see why you try to retain such a minor optimization for newer
Intel chips when at
Hello,
On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 11:31:50AM -0800, Dave Hansen wrote:
> Hugh Dickins also points out that PCIDs really have two distinct
> use-cases in the context of KAISER. The first way they can be used
I don't see why you try to retain such a minor optimization for newer
Intel chips when at
4 matches
Mail list logo