Nate Diller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> but that's a lot of code to avoid a single stack allocation. The
> whole fake file pointer thing still strikes me as a little ugly, and
> you're definitely not the first one who needed this sort of hackery.
> ugh
A better way might be to stick a void *
Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hmmm you're right. Is your security work going into the next -mm?
> >
> > I don't know. Andrew hasn't said anything. Andrew? Are you waiting for it
> > to go through DaveM's networking tree?
>
> AF_RXRPC is a davem thing and "AFS: Add security
On 4/12/07, David Howells <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Nate Diller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hmmm you're right. Is your security work going into the next -mm?
I don't know. Andrew hasn't said anything. Andrew? Are you waiting for it
to go through DaveM's networking tree?
> If so, I'll
On Thu, 12 Apr 2007 19:57:23 +0100
David Howells <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hmmm you're right. Is your security work going into the next -mm?
>
> I don't know. Andrew hasn't said anything. Andrew? Are you waiting for it
> to go through DaveM's networking tree?
AF_RXRPC is a davem thing
Nate Diller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hmmm you're right. Is your security work going into the next -mm?
I don't know. Andrew hasn't said anything. Andrew? Are you waiting for it
to go through DaveM's networking tree?
> If so, I'll just re-base this cleanup patch on that ... at the very
On 4/12/07, David Howells <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Nate Diller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -static struct page *afs_dir_get_page(struct inode *dir, unsigned long index)
NAK. This conflicts with my AFS security patches, and eliminates any way of
passing the key through to readpage().
Hmmm
Nate Diller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -static struct page *afs_dir_get_page(struct inode *dir, unsigned long index)
NAK. This conflicts with my AFS security patches, and eliminates any way of
passing the key through to readpage().
David
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
Nate Diller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-static struct page *afs_dir_get_page(struct inode *dir, unsigned long index)
NAK. This conflicts with my AFS security patches, and eliminates any way of
passing the key through to readpage().
David
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
On 4/12/07, David Howells [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nate Diller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-static struct page *afs_dir_get_page(struct inode *dir, unsigned long index)
NAK. This conflicts with my AFS security patches, and eliminates any way of
passing the key through to readpage().
Hmmm
Nate Diller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmmm you're right. Is your security work going into the next -mm?
I don't know. Andrew hasn't said anything. Andrew? Are you waiting for it
to go through DaveM's networking tree?
If so, I'll just re-base this cleanup patch on that ... at the very least
On Thu, 12 Apr 2007 19:57:23 +0100
David Howells [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmmm you're right. Is your security work going into the next -mm?
I don't know. Andrew hasn't said anything. Andrew? Are you waiting for it
to go through DaveM's networking tree?
AF_RXRPC is a davem thing and
On 4/12/07, David Howells [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nate Diller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmmm you're right. Is your security work going into the next -mm?
I don't know. Andrew hasn't said anything. Andrew? Are you waiting for it
to go through DaveM's networking tree?
If so, I'll just
Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmmm you're right. Is your security work going into the next -mm?
I don't know. Andrew hasn't said anything. Andrew? Are you waiting for it
to go through DaveM's networking tree?
AF_RXRPC is a davem thing and AFS: Add security support and
Nate Diller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
but that's a lot of code to avoid a single stack allocation. The
whole fake file pointer thing still strikes me as a little ugly, and
you're definitely not the first one who needed this sort of hackery.
ugh
A better way might be to stick a void * in
14 matches
Mail list logo
