Kamalesh Babulal wrote:
> Kamalesh Babulal wrote:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>> Convert cpu_sibling_map to a per_cpu cpumask_t array for the ppc64
>>> architecture.
>>>
>>> Note: these changes have not been built nor tested.
>>>
>>> Note: I also don't know if these changes are particularly
>>> re
Kamalesh Babulal wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Convert cpu_sibling_map to a per_cpu cpumask_t array for the ppc64
architecture.
Note: these changes have not been built nor tested.
Note: I also don't know if these changes are particularly
relevant for the ppc64 architecture.
Signed-off-by: M
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Convert cpu_sibling_map to a per_cpu cpumask_t array for the ppc64
architecture.
Note: these changes have not been built nor tested.
Note: I also don't know if these changes are particularly
relevant for the ppc64 architecture.
Signed-off-by: Mike Travis <[EMAIL PROTEC
3 matches
Mail list logo