On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 10:25 PM, Akinobu Mita wrote:
> 2015-06-28 1:08 GMT+09:00 Ming Lei :
>> On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 1:14 AM, Akinobu Mita wrote:
>>> Akinobu Mita wrote:
2015-06-26 0:40 GMT+09:00 Ming Lei :
> On Thu, 25 Jun 2015 21:49:43 +0900
> Akinobu Mita wrote:
>> For
2015-06-28 1:08 GMT+09:00 Ming Lei :
> On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 1:14 AM, Akinobu Mita wrote:
>> Akinobu Mita wrote:
>>> 2015-06-26 0:40 GMT+09:00 Ming Lei :
>>> > On Thu, 25 Jun 2015 21:49:43 +0900
>>> > Akinobu Mita wrote:
>>> >> For example, there is a single hw queue (hctx) and two CPU queues
On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 1:14 AM, Akinobu Mita wrote:
> Akinobu Mita wrote:
>> 2015-06-26 0:40 GMT+09:00 Ming Lei :
>> > On Thu, 25 Jun 2015 21:49:43 +0900
>> > Akinobu Mita wrote:
>> >> For example, there is a single hw queue (hctx) and two CPU queues
>> >> (ctx0 for CPU0, and ctx1 for CPU1). N
Akinobu Mita wrote:
> 2015-06-26 0:40 GMT+09:00 Ming Lei :
> > On Thu, 25 Jun 2015 21:49:43 +0900
> > Akinobu Mita wrote:
> >> For example, there is a single hw queue (hctx) and two CPU queues
> >> (ctx0 for CPU0, and ctx1 for CPU1). Now CPU1 is just onlined and
> >> a request is inserted into c
2015-06-26 0:40 GMT+09:00 Ming Lei :
> On Thu, 25 Jun 2015 21:49:43 +0900
> Akinobu Mita wrote:
>> For example, there is a single hw queue (hctx) and two CPU queues
>> (ctx0 for CPU0, and ctx1 for CPU1). Now CPU1 is just onlined and
>> a request is inserted into ctx1->rq_list and set bit0 in pend
On Thu, 25 Jun 2015 21:49:43 +0900
Akinobu Mita wrote:
> 2015-06-25 17:07 GMT+09:00 Ming Lei :
> > On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 10:56 AM, Akinobu Mita
> > wrote:
> >> 2015-06-25 1:24 GMT+09:00 Ming Lei :
> >>> On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 10:34 PM, Akinobu Mita
> >>> wrote:
> Hi Ming,
>
> >>>
2015-06-25 17:07 GMT+09:00 Ming Lei :
> On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 10:56 AM, Akinobu Mita wrote:
>> 2015-06-25 1:24 GMT+09:00 Ming Lei :
>>> On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 10:34 PM, Akinobu Mita
>>> wrote:
Hi Ming,
2015-06-24 18:46 GMT+09:00 Ming Lei :
> On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 9:52 PM,
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 10:56 AM, Akinobu Mita wrote:
> 2015-06-25 1:24 GMT+09:00 Ming Lei :
>> On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 10:34 PM, Akinobu Mita
>> wrote:
>>> Hi Ming,
>>>
>>> 2015-06-24 18:46 GMT+09:00 Ming Lei :
On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 9:52 PM, Akinobu Mita
wrote:
> ctx->index_hw
2015-06-25 1:24 GMT+09:00 Ming Lei :
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 10:34 PM, Akinobu Mita wrote:
>> Hi Ming,
>>
>> 2015-06-24 18:46 GMT+09:00 Ming Lei :
>>> On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 9:52 PM, Akinobu Mita
>>> wrote:
ctx->index_hw is zero for the CPUs which have never been onlined since
the b
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 10:34 PM, Akinobu Mita wrote:
> Hi Ming,
>
> 2015-06-24 18:46 GMT+09:00 Ming Lei :
>> On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 9:52 PM, Akinobu Mita wrote:
>>> ctx->index_hw is zero for the CPUs which have never been onlined since
>>> the block queue was initialized. If one of those CPUs
Hi Ming,
2015-06-24 18:46 GMT+09:00 Ming Lei :
> On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 9:52 PM, Akinobu Mita wrote:
>> ctx->index_hw is zero for the CPUs which have never been onlined since
>> the block queue was initialized. If one of those CPUs is hotadded and
>> starts handling request before new mappings
On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 9:52 PM, Akinobu Mita wrote:
> ctx->index_hw is zero for the CPUs which have never been onlined since
> the block queue was initialized. If one of those CPUs is hotadded and
> starts handling request before new mappings are established, pending
Could you explain a bit wha
12 matches
Mail list logo