On 22.03.2018 15:43, Stefan Agner wrote:
> On 22.03.2018 12:48, Robin Murphy wrote:
>> On 21/03/18 21:41, Stefan Agner wrote:
>>> On 21.03.2018 18:16, Robin Murphy wrote:
On 21/03/18 16:40, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 03/21/2018 09:26 AM, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>> On 21.03.2018 17:09, S
On 22.03.2018 12:48, Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 21/03/18 21:41, Stefan Agner wrote:
>> On 21.03.2018 18:16, Robin Murphy wrote:
>>> On 21/03/18 16:40, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 03/21/2018 09:26 AM, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> On 21.03.2018 17:09, Stefan Agner wrote:
>> On 21.03.2018 13:13, R
On 21/03/18 21:41, Stefan Agner wrote:
On 21.03.2018 18:16, Robin Murphy wrote:
On 21/03/18 16:40, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 03/21/2018 09:26 AM, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
On 21.03.2018 17:09, Stefan Agner wrote:
On 21.03.2018 13:13, Robin Murphy wrote:
On 20/03/18 23:02, Stefan Agner wrote:
As
On 21.03.2018 18:16, Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 21/03/18 16:40, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> On 03/21/2018 09:26 AM, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>>> On 21.03.2018 17:09, Stefan Agner wrote:
On 21.03.2018 13:13, Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 20/03/18 23:02, Stefan Agner wrote:
>> As documented in GCC n
On 21/03/18 16:40, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 03/21/2018 09:26 AM, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
On 21.03.2018 17:09, Stefan Agner wrote:
On 21.03.2018 13:13, Robin Murphy wrote:
On 20/03/18 23:02, Stefan Agner wrote:
As documented in GCC naked functions should only use Basic asm
syntax. The Extended
On 03/21/2018 09:26 AM, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
On 21.03.2018 17:09, Stefan Agner wrote:
On 21.03.2018 13:13, Robin Murphy wrote:
On 20/03/18 23:02, Stefan Agner wrote:
As documented in GCC naked functions should only use Basic asm
syntax. The Extended asm or mixture of Basic asm and "C" code i
On 21.03.2018 17:09, Stefan Agner wrote:
> On 21.03.2018 13:13, Robin Murphy wrote:
>> On 20/03/18 23:02, Stefan Agner wrote:
>>> As documented in GCC naked functions should only use Basic asm
>>> syntax. The Extended asm or mixture of Basic asm and "C" code is
>>> not guaranteed. Currently this wo
On 21.03.2018 13:13, Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 20/03/18 23:02, Stefan Agner wrote:
>> As documented in GCC naked functions should only use Basic asm
>> syntax. The Extended asm or mixture of Basic asm and "C" code is
>> not guaranteed. Currently this works because it was hard coded
>> to follow and
On 20/03/18 23:02, Stefan Agner wrote:
As documented in GCC naked functions should only use Basic asm
syntax. The Extended asm or mixture of Basic asm and "C" code is
not guaranteed. Currently this works because it was hard coded
to follow and check GCC behavior for arguments and register
placeme
On 21.03.2018 00:13, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 12:02:04AM +0100, Stefan Agner wrote:
>> As documented in GCC naked functions should only use Basic asm
>> syntax. The Extended asm or mixture of Basic asm and "C" code is
>> not guaranteed. Currently this works because
On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 12:02:04AM +0100, Stefan Agner wrote:
> As documented in GCC naked functions should only use Basic asm
> syntax. The Extended asm or mixture of Basic asm and "C" code is
> not guaranteed. Currently this works because it was hard coded
> to follow and check GCC behavior for a
11 matches
Mail list logo