> On Wed, 05 Sep 2007 07:46:36 -0700 Mike Travis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> >> On Wed, 5 Sep 2007 09:10:10 +0100 Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> I can easily do the changes for ia64 and test them. I don't have the
> >>> capability of testing on the powerp
Andrew Morton wrote:
>> On Wed, 5 Sep 2007 09:10:10 +0100 Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> I can easily do the changes for ia64 and test them. I don't have the
>>> capability of testing on the powerpc.
>> You can get cross compilers and make it compile
>
> http://userweb.kernel.org/~ak
> On Wed, 5 Sep 2007 09:10:10 +0100 Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I can easily do the changes for ia64 and test them. I don't have the
> > capability of testing on the powerpc.
>
> You can get cross compilers and make it compile
http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/cross-compilers/
-
To u
> > It'd be better to convert the unconverted architectures?
Agreed.
> I can easily do the changes for ia64 and test them. I don't have the
> capability of testing on the powerpc.
You can get cross compilers and make it compile and I'm sure some
powerpc person will be happy to test it then whe
On Tue, 4 Sep 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > My question though, would include/linux/smp.h be the appropriate place for
> > the above define? (That is, if the above approach is the correct one... ;-)
>
> It'd be better to convert the unconverted architectures?
That is certainly the cleanest sol
> On Tue, 04 Sep 2007 16:11:31 -0700 Mike Travis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > It'd be better to convert the unconverted architectures?
>
> I can easily do the changes for ia64 and test them. I don't have the
> capability
> of testing on the powerpc.
>
> And are you asking for just the
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> Cc: Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED],
>>> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
>>> Christoph Lameter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] x86: Convert cpu_sibling_map to be a per cpu
>>> variable
&g
essage --
> > Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 19:49:03 -0700
> > From: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Cc: Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED],
> > linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
> > Christoph Lameter &l
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED],
> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
> Christoph Lameter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] x86: Convert cpu_sibling_map to be a per cpu variable
> (v2)
>
>
Andrew Morton wrote:
On Sat, 01 Sep 2007 17:04:06 +0530 Kamalesh Babulal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Andrew Morton wrote:
On Fri, 24 Aug 2007 15:26:57 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Convert cpu_sibling_map from a static array sized by NR_CPUS to a
per_cpu variable. This saves si
> On Sat, 01 Sep 2007 17:04:06 +0530 Kamalesh Babulal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Fri, 24 Aug 2007 15:26:57 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> >
> >> Convert cpu_sibling_map from a static array sized by NR_CPUS to a
> >> per_cpu variable. This saves sizeof(cpumask
On Saturday 01 September 2007 04:49, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Aug 2007 15:26:57 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Convert cpu_sibling_map from a static array sized by NR_CPUS to a
> > per_cpu variable. This saves sizeof(cpumask_t) * NR unused cpus.
> > Access is mostly from startup and C
Andrew Morton wrote:
On Fri, 24 Aug 2007 15:26:57 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Convert cpu_sibling_map from a static array sized by NR_CPUS to a
per_cpu variable. This saves sizeof(cpumask_t) * NR unused cpus.
Access is mostly from startup and CPU HOTPLUG functions.
ia64 allmodconf
On Fri, 24 Aug 2007 15:26:57 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Convert cpu_sibling_map from a static array sized by NR_CPUS to a
> per_cpu variable. This saves sizeof(cpumask_t) * NR unused cpus.
> Access is mostly from startup and CPU HOTPLUG functions.
ia64 allmodconfig:
kernel/sched.c: In fun
14 matches
Mail list logo
