On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 03:19:02PM -0800, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Feb 2014, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
>
> > node isn't changed, so we don't need to retreive this structure
> > everytime we move the object. Maybe compiler do this optimization,
> > but making it explicitly is better.
> >
>
> W
On Fri, 14 Feb 2014, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> node isn't changed, so we don't need to retreive this structure
> everytime we move the object. Maybe compiler do this optimization,
> but making it explicitly is better.
>
Would it be possible to make it const struct kmem_cache_node *n then?
--
To unsub
On Fri, 14 Feb 2014, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> node isn't changed, so we don't need to retreive this structure
> everytime we move the object. Maybe compiler do this optimization,
> but making it explicitly is better.
Acked-by: Christoph Lameter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubs
3 matches
Mail list logo
