On Sun, Sep 22, 2019 at 9:04 PM Ben Hutchings wrote:
>
> It looks like this is triggered by you switching arm builds from gcc 8
> to 9, rather than by any code change.
>
> Does it actually make sense to try to support building Linux 3.16 with
> gcc 9? If so, I suppose I'll need to add:
>
> commit
On Fri, 2019-09-20 at 18:35 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 9/20/19 2:16 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Fri, 2019-09-20 at 13:04 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 03:23:34PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.16.74 re
On 9/20/19 2:16 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Fri, 2019-09-20 at 13:04 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 03:23:34PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.16.74 release.
There are 132 patches in this series, which will be posted as res
On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 10:16:49PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Fri, 2019-09-20 at 13:04 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 03:23:34PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.16.74 release.
> > > There are 132 patches in this
On Fri, 2019-09-20 at 13:04 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 03:23:34PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.16.74 release.
> > There are 132 patches in this series, which will be posted as responses
> > to this one. If anyone
On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 03:23:34PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.16.74 release.
> There are 132 patches in this series, which will be posted as responses
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
6 matches
Mail list logo
