Re: [PATCH 4/5] f2fs: align f2fs maximum name length to linux based filesystem

2013-03-07 Thread Namjae Jeon
2013/3/8, Jaegeuk Kim : > 2013-03-04 (월), 15:25 +0900, Namjae Jeon: >> 2013/3/3, Jaegeuk Kim : >> > We should not change the on-disk layout. >> > Instead, simply we can deal with it by changing original condition >> > check >> > like below. >> >> Even though the changes you suggested are ok. But th

Re: [PATCH 4/5] f2fs: align f2fs maximum name length to linux based filesystem

2013-03-07 Thread Jaegeuk Kim
2013-03-04 (월), 15:25 +0900, Namjae Jeon: > 2013/3/3, Jaegeuk Kim : > > We should not change the on-disk layout. > > Instead, simply we can deal with it by changing original condition check > > like below. > > Even though the changes you suggested are ok. But there is one doubt. > By not changing

Re: [PATCH 4/5] f2fs: align f2fs maximum name length to linux based filesystem

2013-03-03 Thread Namjae Jeon
2013/3/3, Jaegeuk Kim : > We should not change the on-disk layout. > Instead, simply we can deal with it by changing original condition check > like below. Even though the changes you suggested are ok. But there is one doubt. By not changing the on-disk layout and just taking care of the limits us

Re: [PATCH 4/5] f2fs: align f2fs maximum name length to linux based filesystem

2013-03-02 Thread Jaegeuk Kim
We should not change the on-disk layout. Instead, simply we can deal with it by changing original condition check like below. --- From ccc2546eded1efd2d6ed98f8aee7d7ce247cb4a2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jaegeuk Kim Date: Sun, 3 Mar 2013 13:58:05 +0900 Subject: [PATCH] f2fs: align f2fs maximum