Re: [PATCH 4/8] vrange: Clear volatility on new mmaps

2013-06-13 Thread Minchan Kim
Hello John, On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 04:43:58PM -0700, John Stultz wrote: > On 06/12/2013 11:28 PM, Minchan Kim wrote: > >Hey John, > > > >On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 09:22:47PM -0700, John Stultz wrote: > >>At lsf-mm, the issue was brought up that there is a precedence with > >>interfaces like mlock,

Re: [PATCH 4/8] vrange: Clear volatility on new mmaps

2013-06-13 Thread John Stultz
On 06/12/2013 11:28 PM, Minchan Kim wrote: Hey John, On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 09:22:47PM -0700, John Stultz wrote: At lsf-mm, the issue was brought up that there is a precedence with interfaces like mlock, such that new mappings in a pre-existing range do no inherit the mlock state. This is mos

Re: [PATCH 4/8] vrange: Clear volatility on new mmaps

2013-06-12 Thread Minchan Kim
Hey John, On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 09:22:47PM -0700, John Stultz wrote: > At lsf-mm, the issue was brought up that there is a precedence with > interfaces like mlock, such that new mappings in a pre-existing range > do no inherit the mlock state. > > This is mostly because mlock only modifies the