On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 06:14:06PM -0400, Donald Parsons wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-07-21 at 14:10 -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > Andrew Morton (1):
> > > arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c: work around gcc-4.4.4 bug
> > >
> > > which must be it. Added Andrew to cc as he hopefully knows the
> > answer t
On Tue, 2015-07-21 at 14:10 -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > Andrew Morton (1):
> > arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c: work around gcc-4.4.4 bug
> >
> > which must be it. Added Andrew to cc as he hopefully knows the
> answer to your question.
>
> You can dig through git to find it pretty easily...
>
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 05:02:31PM -0400, Donald Parsons wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-07-21 at 11:13 -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 01:13:27PM -0400, Donald Parsons wrote:
> > > Greg,
> > >
> > > The kernel still does not compile with gcc-4.5.1 since linux-4.0.5 when
> > > a
On Tue, 2015-07-21 at 11:13 -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 01:13:27PM -0400, Donald Parsons wrote:
> > Greg,
> >
> > The kernel still does not compile with gcc-4.5.1 since linux-4.0.5 when
> > a kvm back-port from 4.1-rc5 went in. (This is on Linux 4.1.2 SMP Mon
> > Ju
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 01:13:27PM -0400, Donald Parsons wrote:
> Greg,
>
> The kernel still does not compile with gcc-4.5.1 since linux-4.0.5 when
> a kvm back-port from 4.1-rc5 went in. (This is on Linux 4.1.2 SMP Mon
> Jul 13 18:08:30 EDT 2015 x86_64 Fedora 14)
>
> This mis-compile was f
Greg,
The kernel still does not compile with gcc-4.5.1 since linux-4.0.5 when
a kvm back-port from 4.1-rc5 went in. (This is on Linux 4.1.2 SMP Mon
Jul 13 18:08:30 EDT 2015 x86_64 Fedora 14)
This mis-compile was fixed in 4.1-rc8. The diff was:
diff -ur linux-4.1-rc7/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
lin
On Monday, July 20, 2015 03:04:06 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 11:29:28PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Sunday, July 19, 2015 12:10:38 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.0.9 release.
> > > There are 58 patches
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 11:29:28PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Sunday, July 19, 2015 12:10:38 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.0.9 release.
> > There are 58 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If
On Sunday, July 19, 2015 12:10:38 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.0.9 release.
> There are 58 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
>
On 07/19/2015 01:10 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.0.9 release.
> There are 58 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses sho
On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 12:10:38PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.0.9 release.
> There are 58 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
On 07/19/2015 12:10 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.0.9 release.
There are 58 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.
Responses should be mad
12 matches
Mail list logo
