Re: [PATCH 6/6] Do not use FASTCALL for __alloc_pages_nodemask()

2007-08-21 Thread Mel Gorman
On (18/08/07 14:51), Andi Kleen didst pronounce: > On Friday 17 August 2007 23:07:33 Christoph Lameter wrote: > > On Fri, 17 Aug 2007, Mel Gorman wrote: > > > > > Opinions as to why FASTCALL breaks on one machine are welcome. > > > > Could we get rid of FASTCALL? AFAIK the compiler should automat

Re: [PATCH 6/6] Do not use FASTCALL for __alloc_pages_nodemask()

2007-08-18 Thread Andi Kleen
On Friday 17 August 2007 23:07:33 Christoph Lameter wrote: > On Fri, 17 Aug 2007, Mel Gorman wrote: > > > Opinions as to why FASTCALL breaks on one machine are welcome. > > Could we get rid of FASTCALL? AFAIK the compiler should automatically > choose the right calling convention? It was a nop

Re: [PATCH 6/6] Do not use FASTCALL for __alloc_pages_nodemask()

2007-08-17 Thread Christoph Lameter
On Fri, 17 Aug 2007, Mel Gorman wrote: > Opinions as to why FASTCALL breaks on one machine are welcome. Could we get rid of FASTCALL? AFAIK the compiler should automatically choose the right calling convention? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body