On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 11:03:08PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> > > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
> > > +++ b/arch/sparc/kernel/sysfs.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/sparc-us2e-cpufreq.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/sparc-us3-cpufreq.c
>
> > > - cpumask_copy(&cpus_al
* Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
> > +++ b/arch/sparc/kernel/sysfs.c
> > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/sparc-us2e-cpufreq.c
> > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/sparc-us3-cpufreq.c
> > - cpumask_copy(&cpus_allowed, tsk_cpus_allowed(current));
> > + cpumask_copy(&cpus_allowed, ¤t->cp
On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 02:29:21PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
> index 54903862cf57..f40e2a5cf044 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
> @@ -796,7 +796,7 @@ void __init smp_cpus_done(unsigned in
On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 02:29:21PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> So the original intention of tsk_cpus_allowed() was to 'future-proof'
> the field - but it's pretty ineffectual at that, because half of
> the code uses ->cpus_allowed directly ...
>
> Also, the wrapper makes the code longer than the o
4 matches
Mail list logo
