Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.9 33/33] xfs: don't allow NOWAIT DIO across extent boundaries

2020-11-25 Thread Dave Chinner
On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 06:46:54PM -0500, Sasha Levin wrote: > On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 08:52:47AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > > We've already had one XFS upstream kernel regression in this -rc > > cycle propagated to the stable kernels in 5.9.9 because the stable > > process picked up a bunch of r

Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.9 33/33] xfs: don't allow NOWAIT DIO across extent boundaries

2020-11-25 Thread Sasha Levin
On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 08:52:47AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: We've already had one XFS upstream kernel regression in this -rc cycle propagated to the stable kernels in 5.9.9 because the stable process picked up a bunch of random XFS fixes within hours of them being merged by Linus. One of those

Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.9 33/33] xfs: don't allow NOWAIT DIO across extent boundaries

2020-11-25 Thread Dave Chinner
On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 10:35:50AM -0500, Sasha Levin wrote: > From: Dave Chinner > > [ Upstream commit 883a790a84401f6f55992887fd7263d808d4d05d ] > > Jens has reported a situation where partial direct IOs can be issued > and completed yet still return -EAGAIN. We don't want this to report > a s