Re: [PATCH RFC 0/2] pxa_camera transition to v4l2 standalone device

2016-03-21 Thread Hans Verkuil
On 03/21/2016 11:42 PM, Robert Jarzmik wrote: > Hans Verkuil writes: > >>> Input ioctls: >>> test VIDIOC_G/S_TUNER/ENUM_FREQ_BANDS: OK (Not Supported) >>> test VIDIOC_G/S_FREQUENCY: OK (Not Supported) >>> test VIDIOC_S_HW_FREQ_SEEK: OK (Not Supported) >>> test VIDIOC_ENUMAUDIO: OK

Re: [PATCH RFC 0/2] pxa_camera transition to v4l2 standalone device

2016-03-21 Thread Robert Jarzmik
Hans Verkuil writes: >> Input ioctls: >> test VIDIOC_G/S_TUNER/ENUM_FREQ_BANDS: OK (Not Supported) >> test VIDIOC_G/S_FREQUENCY: OK (Not Supported) >> test VIDIOC_S_HW_FREQ_SEEK: OK (Not Supported) >> test VIDIOC_ENUMAUDIO: OK (Not Supported) >> fail: v4l2-test-in

Re: [PATCH RFC 0/2] pxa_camera transition to v4l2 standalone device

2016-03-21 Thread Hans Verkuil
On 03/21/2016 11:26 PM, Robert Jarzmik wrote: > Hans Verkuil writes: > >> On 03/19/2016 10:01 PM, Robert Jarzmik wrote: >>> Hi Hans and Guennadi, >>> >>> As Hans is converting sh_mobile_ceu_camera.c, >> >> That's not going as fast as I hoped. This driver is quite complex and >> extracting >> it

Re: [PATCH RFC 0/2] pxa_camera transition to v4l2 standalone device

2016-03-21 Thread Robert Jarzmik
Hans Verkuil writes: > On 03/19/2016 10:01 PM, Robert Jarzmik wrote: >> Hi Hans and Guennadi, >> >> As Hans is converting sh_mobile_ceu_camera.c, > > That's not going as fast as I hoped. This driver is quite complex and > extracting > it from soc-camera isn't easy. I also can't spend as much ti

Re: [PATCH RFC 0/2] pxa_camera transition to v4l2 standalone device

2016-03-21 Thread Hans Verkuil
On 03/19/2016 10:01 PM, Robert Jarzmik wrote: > Hi Hans and Guennadi, > > As Hans is converting sh_mobile_ceu_camera.c, That's not going as fast as I hoped. This driver is quite complex and extracting it from soc-camera isn't easy. I also can't spend as much time as I'd like on this. > let's se