Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 1/2] Eliminate redundant rcu_sysidle_state variable

2014-07-24 Thread Frederic Weisbecker
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 09:28:52AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > Now that we have rcu_state_p, which references rcu_preempt_state for > TREE_PREEMPT_RCU and rcu_sched_state for TREE_RCU, we don't need a > separate rcu_sysidle_state variable. This commit therefore eliminates > rcu_preempt_state

Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 1/2] Eliminate redundant rcu_sysidle_state variable

2014-07-23 Thread Pranith Kumar
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 12:28 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > Now that we have rcu_state_p, which references rcu_preempt_state for > TREE_PREEMPT_RCU and rcu_sched_state for TREE_RCU, we don't need a > separate rcu_sysidle_state variable. This commit therefore eliminates > rcu_preempt_state in favo