On Friday, June 21, 2013 11:15 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday 21 June 2013, Jason Cooper wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 10:30:47AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > On Friday 21 June 2013, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> > > > I am by far not an expert on how to solve merge strategies and so on
On Friday 21 June 2013, Jason Cooper wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 10:30:47AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Friday 21 June 2013, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> > > I am by far not an expert on how to solve merge strategies and so on,
> > > but to avoid conflicts at Linus's level while merging th
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 10:30:47AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday 21 June 2013, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> > I am by far not an expert on how to solve merge strategies and so on,
> > but to avoid conflicts at Linus's level while merging the arm-soc and
> > pci trees, it would be better if t
On Friday 21 June 2013, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> I am by far not an expert on how to solve merge strategies and so on,
> but to avoid conflicts at Linus's level while merging the arm-soc and
> pci trees, it would be better if this Samsung PCIe driver could go
> through arm-soc (with Bjorn ACK, of
Dear Arnd Bergmann,
On Fri, 21 Jun 2013 09:31:58 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> Bjorn, are you still considering to merge this for 3.11 or have you
> closed your tree for the merge window? I think it would be good to get
> it in.
Note that the of/pci changes needed for this driver are merged thro
On Friday 21 June 2013, Jingoo Han wrote:
> Changes between v9 and v10:
> * Changed the file name from 'pci-designware.c' to 'pcie-designware.c'
> guided by Pratyush Anand, because synopsis pcie and pci controllers
> are different.
> * Fixed the typos of document, reported by Sachin Kam
6 matches
Mail list logo
