On 25-10-16, 16:13, Dave Gerlach wrote:
> I think what you have shared below is a good safety check but if I rename
> the regulator properties in the DT for the cpu (to vdd and vbb, meaning
> cpufreq detects no regulator) and do *not* call dev_pm_opp_set_regulators
> before cpufreq-dt probes we fai
Hi,
On 10/23/2016 11:26 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 23-10-16, 20:08, Dave Gerlach wrote:
Overall this series looks good to me apart from a few small things. Most
importantly I was able to get a working implementation using two regulators
on ti dra7xx platform with proper sequencing built on top o
On 23-10-16, 20:08, Dave Gerlach wrote:
> Overall this series looks good to me apart from a few small things. Most
> importantly I was able to get a working implementation using two regulators
> on ti dra7xx platform with proper sequencing built on top of this series. We
> have cpu regulator and Ad
Hi,
On 10/21/2016 10:40 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 21 October 2016 at 19:09, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 10:44 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
Hi,
Some platforms (like TI) have complex DVFS configuration for CPU
devices, where multiple regulators are required to be configured to
On 21 October 2016 at 19:09, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 10:44 AM, Viresh Kumar
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Some platforms (like TI) have complex DVFS configuration for CPU
>> devices, where multiple regulators are required to be configured to
>> change DVFS state of the device.
On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 10:44 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Some platforms (like TI) have complex DVFS configuration for CPU
> devices, where multiple regulators are required to be configured to
> change DVFS state of the device. This was explained well by Nishanth
> earlier [1].
>
> Some thou
6 matches
Mail list logo
