On 08-02-16, 14:55, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 02/02, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > static int allocate_resources(int cpu, struct device **cdev,
> > struct regulator **creg, struct clk **cclk)
> > {
> > @@ -200,6 +225,7 @@ static int cpufreq_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
>
On 02/02, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> static int allocate_resources(int cpu, struct device **cdev,
> struct regulator **creg, struct clk **cclk)
> {
> @@ -200,6 +225,7 @@ static int cpufreq_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> unsigned long min_uV = ~0, max_uV = 0;
>
On 01-02-16, 18:34, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 01/28, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > + cpu_reg = regulator_get_optional(dev, reg);
> > + ret = PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(cpu_reg);
> > + if (!ret) {
> > + regulator_put(cpu_reg);
>
> What's the point of creating a regulator just to find the name?
> It s
On 01/28, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> @@ -119,6 +120,49 @@ static int set_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> unsigned int index)
> return ret;
> }
>
> +/*
> + * An earlier version of opp-v1 bindings used to name the regulator
> + * "cpu0-supply", we still need to handle that for backwards
4 matches
Mail list logo
