On 21 May 2014 17:05, Inderpal Singh wrote:
> I guess you wanted to say "cpu core code" instead of "cpufreq core".
> Correction may be needed here and in the subsequent patches as well.
When I started implementation, I added code to cpufreq core's init
routine and later moved it to base/cpu.c ..
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 4:40 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> OPP tables are already initialized for all CPUs by cpufreq core and so we
> don't
> need to reinitialize them from arm_big_little_dt driver.
>
I guess you wanted to say "cpu core code" instead of "cpufreq core".
Correction may be needed here
2 matches
Mail list logo
