On 4 October 2013 18:09, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
wrote:
> tglx, could you please take a look at this patch / thread?
Thomas, Ping!!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vge
* Viresh Kumar | 2013-08-07 15:25:55 [+0530]:
>On 24 July 2013 14:47, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> On 18 June 2013 10:21, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>
>> Hi Thomas,
>>
>> Do you still see some light of hope in this patch :) ?
>
>Ping!!
tglx, could you please take a look at this patch / thread?
Sebastian
--
On 24 July 2013 14:47, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 18 June 2013 10:21, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> Do you still see some light of hope in this patch :) ?
Ping!!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
On 18 June 2013 10:21, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 31 May 2013 16:19, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> On 22 May 2013 14:04, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>>> Sorry for being late in replying to your queries.
>>>
>>> On 13 May 2013 16:05, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
Which mechanism is migrating the timer away?
>>>
>>
On 31 May 2013 16:19, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 22 May 2013 14:04, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> Sorry for being late in replying to your queries.
>>
>> On 13 May 2013 16:05, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>>> Which mechanism is migrating the timer away?
>>
>> It will be the same: get_nohz_timer_target() which
On 22 May 2013 14:04, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> Sorry for being late in replying to your queries.
>
> On 13 May 2013 16:05, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> Which mechanism is migrating the timer away?
>
> It will be the same: get_nohz_timer_target() which will decide target
> cpu for migration.
>
>> I have
On 22 May 2013 14:36, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 02:04:16PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>
>> So, this is the clean draft for the idea I had.. (Naming is poor for
>> now):
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/timer.h b/include/linux/timer.h
>> index 8c5a197..ad00ebe 100644
>> --- a/
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 02:04:16PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> So, this is the clean draft for the idea I had.. (Naming is poor for
> now):
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/timer.h b/include/linux/timer.h
> index 8c5a197..ad00ebe 100644
> --- a/include/linux/timer.h
> +++ b/include/linux/timer.h
>
Sorry for being late in replying to your queries.
On 13 May 2013 16:05, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Which mechanism is migrating the timer away?
It will be the same: get_nohz_timer_target() which will decide target
cpu for migration.
> I have no objections to the functionality per se, but the prop
On Mon, 13 May 2013, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 24 April 2013 16:52, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > On 9 April 2013 20:22, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> >> [Steven replied to a personal Ping!!, including everybody again]
> >>
> >> On 9 April 2013 19:25, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 2013-04-09 at 14:05 +05
On 24 April 2013 16:52, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 9 April 2013 20:22, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> [Steven replied to a personal Ping!!, including everybody again]
>>
>> On 9 April 2013 19:25, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2013-04-09 at 14:05 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
Ping!!
>>>
>>> Remi
On 9 April 2013 20:22, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> [Steven replied to a personal Ping!!, including everybody again]
>
> On 9 April 2013 19:25, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>> On Tue, 2013-04-09 at 14:05 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>>> Ping!!
>>>
>>
>> Remind me again. What problem are you trying to solve?
>
>
[Steven replied to a personal Ping!!, including everybody again]
On 9 April 2013 19:25, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-04-09 at 14:05 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> Ping!!
>>
>
> Remind me again. What problem are you trying to solve?
I was trying to migrate a running timer which arms itself
On 27 November 2012 19:17, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-11-06 at 16:08 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> diff --git a/kernel/timer.c b/kernel/timer.c
>> @@ -729,6 +730,12 @@ __mod_timer(struct timer_list *timer, unsigned long
>> expires,
>>
>> base = lock_timer_base(timer, &flags);
>>
[ Added John Stultz ]
On Tue, 2012-11-06 at 16:08 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> Till now, we weren't migrating a running timer because with migration
> del_timer_sync() can't detect that the timer's handler yet has not finished.
>
> Now, when can we actually to reach to the code (inside __mod_time
15 matches
Mail list logo
