>
> On Tue, 18 Nov 2014 14:01:06 +, Kan Liang wrote:
> >> On Fri, 14 Nov 2014 08:44:12 -0500, kan liang wrote:
> >> > +/* LBR only affects the user callchain */
> >> > +if (i != chain_nr) {
> >> > +struct branch_stack *lbr_stack = sampl
On Tue, 18 Nov 2014 14:01:06 +, Kan Liang wrote:
>> On Fri, 14 Nov 2014 08:44:12 -0500, kan liang wrote:
>> > + /* LBR only affects the user callchain */
>> > + if (i != chain_nr) {
>> > + struct branch_stack *lbr_stack = sample-
>> >branch_stack;
>> > +
Hi Kan,
On Tue, 18 Nov 2014 19:40:23 +, Kan Liang wrote:
>> > whole
>> > > >> stack.
>> > > >> > +*/
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Andi is using some sanity checks:
>> > > >> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=141584447819894&w=2
>> > > >> I guess this could be applied in here, once
> > whole
> > > >> stack.
> > > >> > + */
> > > >>
> > > >> Andi is using some sanity checks:
> > > >> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=141584447819894&w=2
> > > >> I guess this could be applied in here, once his patch gets in.
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > > Are you suggesting me
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 03:13:50PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
>
> SNIP
>
> > >> > + * in "from" register, while the callee is
> stored
> > >> > + * in "to" register.
> > >> > + * For example, there is a call stack
> > >> > +
> On Fri, 14 Nov 2014 08:44:12 -0500, kan liang wrote:
> > + /* LBR only affects the user callchain */
> > + if (i != chain_nr) {
> > + struct branch_stack *lbr_stack = sample-
> >branch_stack;
> > + int lbr_nr = lbr_stack->nr;
> > +
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 03:13:50PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
SNIP
> >> > + * in "from" register, while the callee is
> >> > stored
> >> > + * in "to" register.
> >> > + * For example, there is a call stack
> >> > +
On Fri, 14 Nov 2014 08:44:12 -0500, kan liang wrote:
> + /* LBR only affects the user callchain */
> + if (i != chain_nr) {
> + struct branch_stack *lbr_stack = sample->branch_stack;
> + int lbr_nr = lbr_stack->nr;
> +
On Mon, 17 Nov 2014 17:41:32 +, Kan Liang wrote:
>> SNIP
>>
>> > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/session.c b/tools/perf/util/session.c
>> > index f4478ce..335c3a9 100644
>> > --- a/tools/perf/util/session.c
>> > +++ b/tools/perf/util/session.c
>> > @@ -557,15 +557,63 @@ int perf_session_queue_eve
On Mon, 17 Nov 2014 16:55:53 +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 08:44:12AM -0500, kan.li...@intel.com wrote:
>
> SNIP
>
>> +if (lbr) {
>> +for (i = 0; i < chain_nr; i++) {
>> +if (chain->ips[i] == PERF_CONTEXT_USER)
>> +
> SNIP
>
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/session.c b/tools/perf/util/session.c
> > index f4478ce..335c3a9 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/util/session.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/util/session.c
> > @@ -557,15 +557,63 @@ int perf_session_queue_event(struct
> perf_session *s, union perf_event *event,
> >
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 08:44:12AM -0500, kan.li...@intel.com wrote:
SNIP
> + if (lbr) {
> + for (i = 0; i < chain_nr; i++) {
> + if (chain->ips[i] == PERF_CONTEXT_USER)
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + /* LBR only af
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 08:44:12AM -0500, kan.li...@intel.com wrote:
SNIP
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/session.c b/tools/perf/util/session.c
> index f4478ce..335c3a9 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/session.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/session.c
> @@ -557,15 +557,63 @@ int perf_session_queue_event(s
13 matches
Mail list logo
