Hello Ingo/Peter,
On Thu, 26 Feb 2015, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Luck, Tony wrote:
The CAT thing was annoying already, but at least one
can find that in the SDM, this RDT thing, not a single
mention.
The problems of development at the bleeding edge. Would
you rather Linux sat on the sidelines
On Thu, 26 Feb 2015, Vikas Shivappa wrote:
On Thu, 26 Feb 2015, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Luck, Tony wrote:
The CAT thing was annoying already, but at least one
can find that in the SDM, this RDT thing, not a single
mention.
The problems of development at the bleeding edge. Would
you rath
On Thu, 26 Feb 2015, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Luck, Tony wrote:
The CAT thing was annoying already, but at least one
can find that in the SDM, this RDT thing, not a single
mention.
The problems of development at the bleeding edge. Would
you rather Linux sat on the sidelines until there are
e
* Luck, Tony wrote:
> > The CAT thing was annoying already, but at least one
> > can find that in the SDM, this RDT thing, not a single
> > mention.
>
> The problems of development at the bleeding edge. Would
> you rather Linux sat on the sidelines until there are
> enough Google hits from
> The CAT thing was annoying already, but at least one can find that in
> the SDM, this RDT thing, not a single mention.
The problems of development at the bleeding edge. Would you rather Linux
sat on the sidelines until there are enough Google hits from other users of
new features?
I did get one
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 03:16:37PM -0800, Vikas Shivappa wrote:
> This patch adds a new cgroup subsystem to support the new Cache Allocation
> Technology (CAT) feature found in future Intel Xeon Intel processors. CAT is
> part of Resource Director Technology(RDT) or Platform Shared resource contr
6 matches
Mail list logo
