On Thu, 15 Nov 2012 11:31:38 -0700, Stephen Warren
wrote:
> On 11/15/2012 11:20 AM, Grant Likely wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 6:09 PM, Stephen Warren
> > wrote:
> >> On 11/15/2012 04:51 AM, Grant Likely wrote:
> >>> Grant Likely wrote:
> Or how about: I could pick up the patch with o
On 11/15/2012 11:20 AM, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 6:09 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> On 11/15/2012 04:51 AM, Grant Likely wrote:
>>> Grant Likely wrote:
Or how about: I could pick up the patch with only the MIPS hunk and
every other user can be fixed up independently t
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 6:09 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 11/15/2012 04:51 AM, Grant Likely wrote:
>> Grant Likely wrote:
>>> Or how about: I could pick up the patch with only the MIPS hunk and
>>> every other user can be fixed up independently to use the new rule.
>>
>> Here's a trial patch to
On 11/15/2012 04:51 AM, Grant Likely wrote:
> Grant Likely wrote:
>> Or how about: I could pick up the patch with only the MIPS hunk and
>> every other user can be fixed up independently to use the new rule.
>
> Here's a trial patch to fix up ARM. Does this look correct? This patch
> depends on th
Grant Likely wrote:
> Or how about: I could pick up the patch with only the MIPS hunk and
> every other user can be fixed up independently to use the new rule.
Here's a trial patch to fix up ARM. Does this look correct? This patch
depends on the generic dtb build rule already being applied.
g.
-
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 10:15 AM, Grant Likely
wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 10:23 AM, Ralf Baechle wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 10:58:01AM +0100, Ralf Baechle wrote:
>>
>>> Can you fold these MIPS bits into your patch?
>>
>> I missed Lantiq.
>>
>> Ralf
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 10:23 AM, Ralf Baechle wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 10:58:01AM +0100, Ralf Baechle wrote:
>
>> Can you fold these MIPS bits into your patch?
>
> I missed Lantiq.
>
> Ralf
>
> Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle
>
> arch/mips/cavium-octeon/Makefile | 3 ---
> arch/mips/lantiq
On 11/02/2012 04:23 AM, Ralf Baechle wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 10:58:01AM +0100, Ralf Baechle wrote:
>
>> Can you fold these MIPS bits into your patch?
>
> I missed Lantiq.
Thanks, I've squashed that in, and with a quick grep noticed that
arch/{arm64,microblaze} also need updating.
--
To
On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 10:58:01AM +0100, Ralf Baechle wrote:
> Can you fold these MIPS bits into your patch?
I missed Lantiq.
Ralf
Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle
arch/mips/cavium-octeon/Makefile | 3 ---
arch/mips/lantiq/dts/Makefile| 3 ---
arch/mips/netlogic/dts/Makefile | 3 ---
3 fi
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 04:10:30PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
> From: Stephen Warren
>
> All architectures that use cmd_dtc do so in the same way. Move the build
> rule to a central location to avoid duplication.
Can you fold these MIPS bits into your patch?
Ralf
Signed-off-by: Ralf Baech
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 04:10:30PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
> From: Stephen Warren
>
> All architectures that use cmd_dtc do so in the same way. Move the build
> rule to a central location to avoid duplication.
>
> Update Documentation/kbuild to remove the explicit call to cmd_dtc from
> the
11 matches
Mail list logo
