On Thu, 19 Mar 2015, Eric B Munson wrote:
> Currently, pages which are marked as unevictable are protected from
> compaction, but not from other types of migration. The POSIX real time
> extension explicitly states that mlock() will prevent a major page
> fault, but the spirit of is is that mlock
On Thu, 19 Mar 2015, Eric B Munson wrote:
> Thanks, I have a version with the changelog fixed up to actually make
> sense and can submit that if the patch is acceptable otherwise.
Looks good as far as I can see.
Acked-by: Christoph Lameter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsub
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/19/2015 10:56 AM, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 03/19/2015 02:57 PM, Eric B Munson wrote:
>> Currently, pages which are marked as unevictable are protected
>> from compaction, but not from other types of migration. The
>> POSIX real time extension
On 03/19/2015 02:57 PM, Eric B Munson wrote:
> Currently, pages which are marked as unevictable are protected from
> compaction, but not from other types of migration. The POSIX real time
> extension explicitly states that mlock() will prevent a major page
> fault, but the spirit of is is that mlo
On Thu 19-03-15 09:57:10, Eric B Munson wrote:
> Currently, pages which are marked as unevictable are protected from
> compaction, but not from other types of migration. The POSIX real time
> extension explicitly states that mlock() will prevent a major page
> fault, but the spirit of is is that m
5 matches
Mail list logo