On 12/8/2017 9:33 AM, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> On 12/8/2017 4:11 AM, Lothar Waßmann wrote:
>>> While implementing the ACPI piece, I have to convert an unsigned long to
>>> (const void *) in ACPI code so that the APIs are compatible.
>>>
>> Just one more remark: Do you need write access to the data the p
On 12/8/2017 4:11 AM, Lothar Waßmann wrote:
>> While implementing the ACPI piece, I have to convert an unsigned long to
>> (const void *) in ACPI code so that the APIs are compatible.
>>
> Just one more remark: Do you need write access to the data the pointer
> returned by device_get_match_data() o
Hi,
On Thu, 7 Dec 2017 12:50:50 -0500 Sinan Kaya wrote:
> On 12/7/2017 10:20 AM, Lothar Waßmann wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, 7 Dec 2017 09:45:31 -0500 Sinan Kaya wrote:
> >> On 12/7/2017 8:10 AM, Lothar Waßmann wrote:
> +void *of_fwnode_get_match_data(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
>
Hi,
On Thu, 7 Dec 2017 12:50:50 -0500 Sinan Kaya wrote:
> On 12/7/2017 10:20 AM, Lothar Waßmann wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, 7 Dec 2017 09:45:31 -0500 Sinan Kaya wrote:
> >> On 12/7/2017 8:10 AM, Lothar Waßmann wrote:
> +void *of_fwnode_get_match_data(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
>
On 12/7/2017 10:20 AM, Lothar Waßmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 7 Dec 2017 09:45:31 -0500 Sinan Kaya wrote:
>> On 12/7/2017 8:10 AM, Lothar Waßmann wrote:
+void *of_fwnode_get_match_data(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
+ struct device *dev)
>>> Shouldn't this b
Hi,
On Thu, 7 Dec 2017 09:45:31 -0500 Sinan Kaya wrote:
> On 12/7/2017 8:10 AM, Lothar Waßmann wrote:
> >> +void *of_fwnode_get_match_data(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
> >> + struct device *dev)
> > Shouldn't this be 'const void *of_fwnode_get_match_data
>
> OF keep
On 12/7/2017 8:10 AM, Lothar Waßmann wrote:
>> +void *of_fwnode_get_match_data(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
>> + struct device *dev)
> Shouldn't this be 'const void *of_fwnode_get_match_data
OF keeps the driver data as a (const void*) internally. ACPI keeps the
dri
Hi,
On Tue, 5 Dec 2017 12:04:49 -0500 Sinan Kaya wrote:
> Now that we have a get_match_data() callback as part of the firmware node,
> implement the OF specific piece for it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya
> ---
> drivers/of/property.c | 7 +++
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --
Hi Sinan,
On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 12:04:49PM -0500, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> Now that we have a get_match_data() callback as part of the firmware node,
> implement the OF specific piece for it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya
> ---
> drivers/of/property.c | 7 +++
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 11:04 AM, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> Now that we have a get_match_data() callback as part of the firmware node,
> implement the OF specific piece for it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya
> ---
> drivers/of/property.c | 7 +++
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/dr
10 matches
Mail list logo