Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: kprobe: remove unused declaring of bpf_kprobe_override

Hi, On Thu, 18 Jul 2024 09:32:13 +0800 Menglong Dong wrote: > On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 10:18 PM Masami Hiramatsu wrote: > > > > On Wed, 10 Jul 2024 15:13:07 +0200 > > Jiri Olsa wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 04:59:39PM +0800, Menglong Dong wrote: > > > > After the commit 5ad2f102

Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: kprobe: remove unused declaring of bpf_kprobe_override

On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 10:18 PM Masami Hiramatsu wrote: > > On Wed, 10 Jul 2024 15:13:07 +0200 > Jiri Olsa wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 04:59:39PM +0800, Menglong Dong wrote: > > > After the commit 5ad2f102 ("tracing/kprobe: bpf: Compare instruction > > > > should be in Fixes: tag pr

Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: kprobe: remove unused declaring of bpf_kprobe_override

On Wed, 10 Jul 2024 15:13:07 +0200 Jiri Olsa wrote: > On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 04:59:39PM +0800, Menglong Dong wrote: > > After the commit 5ad2f102 ("tracing/kprobe: bpf: Compare instruction > > should be in Fixes: tag probably ? Yes, I'll add a Fixed tag. > > > pointer with original one")

Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: kprobe: remove unused declaring of bpf_kprobe_override

On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 04:59:39PM +0800, Menglong Dong wrote: > After the commit 5ad2f102 ("tracing/kprobe: bpf: Compare instruction should be in Fixes: tag probably ? > pointer with original one"), "bpf_kprobe_override" is not used anywhere > anymore, and we can remove it now. > > Signed-o