On Thu, Sep 03, 2020 at 04:45:07PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> The hope was to have a good version of them completed some weeks ago,
> but life intervened.
>
> My current thought is to move these three patches out of my queue for
> v5.10 to try again in v5.11:
>
> 0b8c06b75ea1 ("tools/memor
On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 04:11:10PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 10:04:21AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 09:45:04PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
>
> > > The question is, what are you trying to accomplish in this section? Are
> > > you trying to demo
On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 10:04:21AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 09:45:04PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> > The question is, what are you trying to accomplish in this section? Are
> > you trying to demonstrate that it isn't safe to allow arbitrary code to
> > leak into a
On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 09:45:04PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 02:47:38PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 04:17:01PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
>
> > > Is this discussion perhaps overkill?
> > >
> > > Let's put it this way: Suppose we have the follo
On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 02:47:38PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 04:17:01PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> > Is this discussion perhaps overkill?
> >
> > Let's put it this way: Suppose we have the following code:
> >
> > P0(int *x, int *lck)
> > {
> > s
On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 04:17:01PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 11:20:37AM -0700, paul...@kernel.org wrote:
> > +No Roach-Motel Locking!
> > +---
> > +
> > +This example requires familiarity with the herd7 "filter" clause, so
> > +please read up on that top
On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 11:20:37AM -0700, paul...@kernel.org wrote:
> +No Roach-Motel Locking!
> +---
> +
> +This example requires familiarity with the herd7 "filter" clause, so
> +please read up on that topic in litmus-tests.txt.
> +
> +It is tempting to allow memory-reference
7 matches
Mail list logo