Re: [PATCH net] bonding: fix accounting of active ports in 3ad

2017-05-19 Thread David Miller
From: Jarod Wilson Date: Fri, 19 May 2017 18:15:57 -0400 > On 2017-05-19 5:14 PM, David Miller wrote: >> From: Jarod Wilson >> Date: Wed, 17 May 2017 11:11:44 -0400 >> >>> As of 7bb11dc9f59d and 0622cab0341c, bond slaves in a 3ad bond are not >>> removed from the aggregator when they are down,

Re: [PATCH net] bonding: fix accounting of active ports in 3ad

2017-05-19 Thread Jarod Wilson
On 2017-05-19 5:14 PM, David Miller wrote: From: Jarod Wilson Date: Wed, 17 May 2017 11:11:44 -0400 As of 7bb11dc9f59d and 0622cab0341c, bond slaves in a 3ad bond are not removed from the aggregator when they are down, and the active slave count is NOT equal to number of ports in the aggregato

Re: [PATCH net] bonding: fix accounting of active ports in 3ad

2017-05-19 Thread David Miller
From: Jarod Wilson Date: Wed, 17 May 2017 11:11:44 -0400 > As of 7bb11dc9f59d and 0622cab0341c, bond slaves in a 3ad bond are not > removed from the aggregator when they are down, and the active slave count > is NOT equal to number of ports in the aggregator, but rather the number > of ports in t