Hi David,
On 15-08-11 12:05:18, David Miller wrote:
> From: David Miller
> Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 12:00:27 -0700 (PDT)
>
> > Ok, if you guys really want me to I'll do the revert-reapply thing.
>
> Done.
Thank you, this is much appreciated.
-v
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "u
From: David Miller
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 12:00:27 -0700 (PDT)
> Ok, if you guys really want me to I'll do the revert-reapply thing.
Done.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http
From: David Miller
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 11:52:49 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Vivien Didelot
> Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 14:18:42 -0400 (EDT)
>
>> On Aug 11, 2015, at 2:07 PM, David da...@davemloft.net wrote:
>>
>>> From: Florian Fainelli
>>> Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 11:03:35 -0700
>>>
Put differen
From: Vivien Didelot
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 14:18:42 -0400 (EDT)
> On Aug 11, 2015, at 2:07 PM, David da...@davemloft.net wrote:
>
>> From: Florian Fainelli
>> Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 11:03:35 -0700
>>
>>> Put differently, my question is how do you value not rewriting
>>> history vs. breaking b
Hi David,
On Aug 11, 2015, at 2:07 PM, David da...@davemloft.net wrote:
> From: Florian Fainelli
> Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 11:03:35 -0700
>
>> Put differently, my question is how do you value not rewriting
>> history vs. breaking bisectability (by accident of course)?
>
> I never will rewrite h
From: Florian Fainelli
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 11:03:35 -0700
> Put differently, my question is how do you value not rewriting
> history vs. breaking bisectability (by accident of course)?
I never will rewrite history, ever.
Too many people clone my tree and depend upon it.
--
To unsubscribe fr
On 11/08/15 10:38, David Miller wrote:
> From: Vivien Didelot
> Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 12:25:06 -0400 (EDT)
>
>> I can work on fixup patches to restore v3 changes on top of v2, but this
>> won't fix the bisectability issue.
>>
>> Instead of fixing individual portions, reverting the merge commit
>
From: Vivien Didelot
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 12:25:06 -0400 (EDT)
> I can work on fixup patches to restore v3 changes on top of v2, but this
> won't fix the bisectability issue.
>
> Instead of fixing individual portions, reverting the merge commit
> f1d5ca4: "Merge branch 'mv88e6xxx-switchdev-fdb
Hi David,
On Aug 10, 2015, at 9:39 AM, Vivien Didelot vivien.dide...@savoirfairelinux.com
wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> On 15-08-09 22:48:22, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Vivien Didelot
>> Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2015 01:44:01 -0400
>>
>> > This patchset refactors the DSA and mv88e6xxx code to use the swi
Hi David,
On 15-08-09 22:48:22, David Miller wrote:
> From: Vivien Didelot
> Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2015 01:44:01 -0400
>
> > This patchset refactors the DSA and mv88e6xxx code to use the switchdev FDB
> > objects.
>
> Series applied, thanks.
I noticed you didn't push the serie yet. I've just sent
From: Vivien Didelot
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2015 01:44:01 -0400
> This patchset refactors the DSA and mv88e6xxx code to use the switchdev FDB
> objects.
Series applied, thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel
11 matches
Mail list logo
