Hello, Christoph.
On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 12:14:16PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> the changes look good to me (although I haven't tested any of your patches
> yet), but the code flow is rather confusing. What do you think about
> the not even compile version of scsi_request_fn() below that
the changes look good to me (although I haven't tested any of your patches
yet), but the code flow is rather confusing. What do you think about
the not even compile version of scsi_request_fn() below that should be
functionally identical to yours:
static void scsi_request_fn(struct request_queu
10_scsi_request_fn_rewrite.patch
This patch rewrites scsi_request_fn(). scsi_dispatch_cmd() is
merged into scsi_request_fn(). Goals are
* Remove unnecessary operations (host_lock unlocking/locking,
recursing into scsi_run_queue(), ...)
* Consolidate def
3 matches
Mail list logo
