On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 04:47:43PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 02:28:14PM -0700, Krister Johansen wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 01:55:00PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > Interesting! This is the first that I have heard that this was anything
> > > other than
On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 02:28:14PM -0700, Krister Johansen wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 01:55:00PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 01:11:48PM -0700, Krister Johansen wrote:
> > > May I impose upon you to CC this patch to stable, and tag it as fixing
> > > abedf8e241?
On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 01:55:00PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 01:11:48PM -0700, Krister Johansen wrote:
> > May I impose upon you to CC this patch to stable, and tag it as fixing
> > abedf8e241? I ran into this on a production 4.9 branch. When I
> > debugged it, I di
On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 01:11:48PM -0700, Krister Johansen wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 02:59:18PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > Wait/wakeup operations do not guarantee ordering on their own. Instead,
> > either locking or memory barriers are required. This commit therefore
Hi Paul,
On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 02:59:18PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> Wait/wakeup operations do not guarantee ordering on their own. Instead,
> either locking or memory barriers are required. This commit therefore
> adds memory barriers to wake_nocb_leader() and nocb_leader_wait().
>
> S
5 matches
Mail list logo
