On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 3:26 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 12:22:06AM -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>> Good findings, that would break the sparc for a while.
>> (we should use res->start instead)
>
> We haven't even gotten to the part that your patch changes. If my
> analysis is
On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 12:22:06AM -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 10:24 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> >> pci_sun4v f02ae7f8: PCI host bridge to bus :00
> >> pci_bus :00: root bus resource [io 0x2007e-0x2007e0fff]
> >> (bus address [0x-0xfff])
> >
> >
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 10:24 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>> pci_sun4v f02ae7f8: PCI host bridge to bus :00
>> pci_bus :00: root bus resource [io 0x2007e-0x2007e0fff]
>> (bus address [0x-0xfff])
>
> Just double-checking that your ioport space really contains 256M ports.
From: Bjorn Helgaas
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 12:24:40 -0600
> Hi Yinghai,
>
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 06:11:53PM -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>> After we add 64bit mmio parsing, we got some "no compatible bridge window"
>> warning on anther new model that support 64bit resource.
>>
>> It turns out th
Hi Yinghai,
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 06:11:53PM -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> After we add 64bit mmio parsing, we got some "no compatible bridge window"
> warning on anther new model that support 64bit resource.
>
> It turns out that we can not use mem_space.start as 64bit mem space
> offset, aka the
5 matches
Mail list logo
