Re: [PATCH v11 2/4] dt-bindings: remoteproc: add Tightly Coupled Memory (TCM) bindings

2024-02-29 Thread Tanmay Shah
Thanks for reviews. Ack to all comments, I will address in next revision. Tanmay On 2/29/24 3:59 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 19/02/2024 18:44, Tanmay Shah wrote: > > From: Radhey Shyam Pandey > > > > Introduce bindings for TCM memory address space on AMD-xilinx Zynq > > UltraScale+

Re: [PATCH v11 2/4] dt-bindings: remoteproc: add Tightly Coupled Memory (TCM) bindings

2024-02-29 Thread Krzysztof Kozlowski
On 19/02/2024 18:44, Tanmay Shah wrote: > From: Radhey Shyam Pandey > > Introduce bindings for TCM memory address space on AMD-xilinx Zynq > UltraScale+ platform. It will help in defining TCM in device-tree > and make it's access platform agnostic and data-driven. > > Tightly-coupled

Re: [PATCH v11 2/4] dt-bindings: remoteproc: add Tightly Coupled Memory (TCM) bindings

2024-02-28 Thread Tanmay Shah
Hi Krzysztof, Ping for reviews. Also have question. I am referring this patch from patchwork link: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/devicetree-bindings/patch/20240219174437.3722620-8-tanmay.s...@amd.com/ Patchwork shows that dtbs-check was failed, but I am sending dts changes in next