"Benno Lossin" writes:
> On Wed Jun 11, 2025 at 12:31 PM CEST, Andreas Hindborg wrote:
>> "Benno Lossin" writes:
>>> On Tue May 6, 2025 at 3:02 PM CEST, Andreas Hindborg wrote:
diff --git a/rust/macros/helpers.rs b/rust/macros/helpers.rs
index a3ee27e29a6f..16d300ad3d3b 100644
---
On Wed Jun 11, 2025 at 12:31 PM CEST, Andreas Hindborg wrote:
> "Benno Lossin" writes:
>> On Tue May 6, 2025 at 3:02 PM CEST, Andreas Hindborg wrote:
>>> diff --git a/rust/macros/helpers.rs b/rust/macros/helpers.rs
>>> index a3ee27e29a6f..16d300ad3d3b 100644
>>> --- a/rust/macros/helpers.rs
>>> ++
"Miguel Ojeda" writes:
> On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 2:24 PM Andreas Hindborg
> wrote:
>>
>> So either we need to `#[allow(missing_docs)]` or just add the line back.
>> What do you prefer?
>
> Do you mean if you remove the `concat!` too, right?
Yes, all of it.
>
> It would need to be `expect`, b
On Wed, May 7, 2025 at 1:23 PM Benno Lossin wrote:
>
> > +unsafe extern "C" fn set_param(
> > +val: *const kernel::ffi::c_char,
> > +param: *const crate::bindings::kernel_param,
> > +) -> core::ffi::c_int
New instance of `core::ffi::` (and both these `c_*` should be unqualified).
Cheers,
On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 2:24 PM Andreas Hindborg wrote:
>
> So either we need to `#[allow(missing_docs)]` or just add the line back. What
> do you prefer?
Do you mean if you remove the `concat!` too, right?
It would need to be `expect`, but I think even an
`expect(missing_docs)` is not really u
Andreas Hindborg writes:
> "Benno Lossin" writes:
>
>> On Tue May 6, 2025 at 3:02 PM CEST, Andreas Hindborg wrote:
>>> Add support for module parameters to the `module!` macro. Implement read
>>> only support for integer types without `sysfs` support.
>>>
>>> Acked-by: Petr Pavlu # from modules
"Benno Lossin" writes:
> On Tue May 6, 2025 at 3:02 PM CEST, Andreas Hindborg wrote:
>> Add support for module parameters to the `module!` macro. Implement read
>> only support for integer types without `sysfs` support.
>>
>> Acked-by: Petr Pavlu # from modules perspective
>> Tested-by: Daniel G
On Tue May 6, 2025 at 3:02 PM CEST, Andreas Hindborg wrote:
> Add support for module parameters to the `module!` macro. Implement read
> only support for integer types without `sysfs` support.
>
> Acked-by: Petr Pavlu # from modules perspective
> Tested-by: Daniel Gomez
> Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-
8 matches
Mail list logo