On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 11:33:00AM +, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Sun, 5 Jan 2014, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 05, 2014 at 06:11:39PM +, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > > On Fri, 3 Jan 2014, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > > > From: Mukesh Rathor
> > > >
> > > > We also
On Sun, 5 Jan 2014, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 05, 2014 at 06:11:39PM +, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > On Fri, 3 Jan 2014, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > > From: Mukesh Rathor
> > >
> > > We also optimize one - the TLB flush. The native operation would
> > > needlessly IPI o
On Sun, Jan 05, 2014 at 06:11:39PM +, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Jan 2014, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > From: Mukesh Rathor
> >
> > We also optimize one - the TLB flush. The native operation would
> > needlessly IPI offline VCPUs causing extra wakeups. Using the
> > Xen one avo
On Fri, 3 Jan 2014, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> From: Mukesh Rathor
>
> We also optimize one - the TLB flush. The native operation would
> needlessly IPI offline VCPUs causing extra wakeups. Using the
> Xen one avoids that and lets the hypervisor determine which
> VCPU needs the TLB flush.
>
4 matches
Mail list logo